For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 001-4802

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No   ¨

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  ý

There were 267,201,840 share of Common Stock, $1.00 par value, outstanding at March 31, 2018.

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2018

Millions of dollars

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, in the opinion of the management of the Company, include all adjustments which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. However, the financial statements do not include all information and accompanying notes required for a presentation in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP"). These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Within the financial statements and tables presented, certain columns and rows may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes. Percentages and earnings per share amounts presented are calculated from the underlying amounts. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full year.

Note 2 – Accounting Changes

In the second quarter of its fiscal year 2018, the Company prospectively adopted an accounting standard update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") relating to the stranded income tax effects on items within Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) resulting from the enactment of new U.S. tax legislation, which legislation is further discussed in Note 14. Additional disclosures regarding this accounting standard adoption are provided in Note 3.

Note 3 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The components and changes of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the six-month period ended March 31, 2018 were as follows:

The amount of foreign currency translation recognized in other comprehensive income during the six months ended March 31, 2018 included net losses relating to net investment hedges, as further discussed in Note 11. As permitted under recently issued U.S. GAAP guidance, the Company reclassified stranded income tax effects on items within Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) resulting from the enactment of new U.S. tax legislation, which legislation is further discussed in Note 14, to Retained earnings during the second quarter of fiscal year 2018. As further discussed in Note 14, the Company has not completed its accounting for the tax effects of the new legislation and as the Company continues to analyze the impact of the legislation on its existing deferred tax balances, the provisional amounts that have been recorded will be updated as required. The reclassified tax effects related to prior service credits and net actuarial losses relating to benefit plans, as well as to terminated cash flow hedges. The tax effects relating to these items are generally recognized as such amounts are amortized into earnings.

Note 5 – Contingencies

As of March 31, 2018, the Company is defending approximately 1,280 product liability claims involving Bard’s line of hernia repair devices (collectively, the “Hernia Product Claims”). The majority of those claims are currently pending in a coordinated proceeding in Rhode Island State Court, but claims are also pending in other state and/or federal court jurisdictions. In addition, those claims include multiple putative class actions in Canada. Generally, the Hernia Product Claims seek damages for personal injury allegedly resulting from use of the products. From time to time, the Company engages in resolution discussions with plaintiffs’ law firms regarding certain of the Hernia Product Claims, but the Company also intends to vigorously defend Hernia Product Claims that do not settle, including through litigation. Trials are scheduled throughout 2018 in various state and federal courts. The Company expects additional trials of Hernia Product Claims to take place over the next 12 months. On April 11, 2018, plaintiffs’ attorneys filed a request for the creation of a new hernia multi-district litigation (“MDL”) in either the Southern District of Ohio or the Western District of Missouri. The Company cannot give any assurances that the resolution of the Hernia Product Claims that have not settled, including asserted and unasserted claims and the putative class action lawsuits, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.

As of March 31, 2018, the Company is defending approximately 3,195 product liability claims involving Bard’s line of pelvic mesh devices. The majority of those claims are currently pending in a federal MDL in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, but claims are also pending in other state and/or federal court jurisdictions, including a coordinated proceeding in New Jersey State Court. In addition, those claims include putative class actions filed in the United States. Not included in the figures above are approximately 1,080 filed and unfiled claims that have been asserted or threatened against Bard but lack sufficient information to determine whether a Bard pelvic mesh device is actually at issue. The claims identified above also include products manufactured by both Bard and two subsidiaries of Medtronic plc (as successor in interest to Covidien plc) (“Medtronic”), each a supplier of Bard. Medtronic has an obligation to defend and indemnify Bard with respect to any product defect liability relating to products its subsidiaries had manufactured. As described below, in July 2015 the Company reached an agreement with Medtronic (which was amended in June 2017) regarding certain aspects of Medtronic’s indemnification obligation. The foregoing lawsuits, unfiled claims, putative class actions, and other claims, together with claims that have settled or are the subject of agreements or agreements in principle to settle, are referred to collectively as the “Women’s Health Product Claims.” The Women’s Health Product Claims generally seek damages for personal injury allegedly resulting from use of the products.

As of March 31, 2018, the Company has reached agreements or agreements in principle with various plaintiffs’ law firms to settle their respective inventories of cases totaling approximately 13,658 of the Women’s Health Product Claims. The Company believes that these Women’s Health Product Claims are not the subject of Medtronic’s indemnification obligation. These settlement agreements and agreements in principle include unfiled and previously unknown claims held by various plaintiffs’ law firms, which are not included in the approximate number of lawsuits set forth in the first paragraph of this section. Each agreement is subject to certain conditions, including requirements for participation in the proposed settlements by a certain minimum number of plaintiffs. The Company continues to engage in discussions with other plaintiffs’ law firms regarding potential resolution of unsettled Women’s Health Product Claims, which may include additional inventory settlements.

Starting in 2014 in the MDL, the court entered certain pre-trial orders requiring trial work up and remand of a significant number of Women’s Health Product Claims, including an order entered in the MDL on January 30, 2018, that requires the work up and remand of all remaining unsettled cases (the “WHP Pre-Trial Orders”). The WHP Pre-Trial Orders may result in material additional costs or trial verdicts in future periods in defending Women’s Health Product Claims. Trials are scheduled throughout 2018 in state courts. A trial in the New Jersey coordinated proceeding began in March 2018, and in April 2018 a jury entered a verdict against the Company in the total amount of $68 million ($33 million compensatory; $35 million punitive). The Company intends to challenge that verdict. The Company expects additional trials of Women’s Health Product Claims to take place over the next 12 months.

In July 2015, as part of the agreement with Medtronic noted above, Medtronic agreed to take responsibility for pursuing settlement of certain of the Women’s Health Product Claims that relate to products distributed by Bard under supply agreements with Medtronic, and Bard has paid Medtronic $121 million towards these potential settlements. In June 2017, Bard amended the agreement with Medtronic to transfer responsibility for settlement of additional Women’s Health Product Claims to Medtronic on terms similar to the July 2015 agreement, including with respect to the obligation to make payments to Medtronic towards these potential settlements. Bard also may, in its sole discretion, transfer responsibility for settlement of additional Women’s Health Product Claims to Medtronic on similar terms. The agreements do not resolve the dispute between Bard and Medtronic with respect to Women’s Health Product Claims that do not settle, if any.

In connection with the acquisition of Bard, as of March 31, 2018, the Company is defending approximately 3,789 product liability claims involving Bard’s line of inferior vena cava filters (collectively, the “Filter Product Claims”). The majority of those claims are currently pending in an MDL in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, but claims are also pending in other state and/or federal court jurisdictions, including a coordinated proceeding in Arizona State Court. In addition, those claims include putative class actions filed in the United States and Canada. The Filter Product Claims generally seek damages for personal injury allegedly resulting from use of the products. The Company has limited information regarding the nature and quantity of certain of the Filter Product Claims. The Company continues to receive claims and lawsuits and may in future periods learn additional information regarding other unfiled or unknown claims, or other lawsuits, which could materially impact the Company’s estimate of the number of claims or lawsuits against the Company. Trials are scheduled throughout 2018 in the MDL and state courts. On March 30, 2018, a jury in the first MDL trial found the Company liable for negligent failure to warn and entered a verdict in favor of plaintiffs. The jury found the Company was not liable for (a) strict liability design defect; (b) strict liability failure to warn; and (c) negligent design. The Company intends to challenge that verdict. The Company expects additional trials of Filter Product Claims may take place over the next 12 months.

In June 2007, Retractable Technologies, Inc. (“RTI”) filed a complaint against the Company under the caption Retractable Technologies, Inc. vs. Becton Dickinson and Company (Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-250, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas) alleging that the BD Integra™ syringes infringe patents licensed exclusively to RTI. Included in its complaint, RTI also alleged that the Company engaged in false advertising with respect to certain of the Company’s safety-engineered products in violation of the Lanham Act; acted to exclude RTI from various product markets and to maintain its market share through, among other things, exclusionary contracts in violation of state and federal antitrust laws; and engaged in unfair competition. In January 2008, the Court severed the patent and non-patent claims into separate cases. BD paid a $5 million award following an adverse infringement verdict at the district court and the Company's unsuccessful appeal.

On September 19, 2013, a jury returned a verdict against BD with respect to RTI’s Lanham Act claim and claim for attempted monopolization based on deception in the safety syringe market. The jury awarded RTI $113.5 million for its attempted

monopolization claim (which would be trebled under the antitrust statute). Upon issuance of a Court of Appeals decision reversing the attempted monopolization claim, the Company recorded a $336 million reversal of reserves associated with the initial judgment, in Other operating (income) expense, net, in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017. The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment for Lanham Act liability, and remanded the case to the district court to consider whether and if so how much profit should be disgorged by BD on that claim.  The Court of Appeals also vacated and remanded the injunction ordered by the district court. On January 31, 2017, RTI filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. On March 20, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari, and the district court thereafter heard RTI’s request for disgorgement. On August 17, 2017, the district court entered judgment in favor of BD and ruled that RTI is not entitled to any award of money damages.  RTI has appealed this ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.

In November 2015, the Department of Defense Inspector General issued an investigative subpoena to Bard. The Department of Health and Human Services is also participating in this investigation. The subpoena seeks documents related to the Company’s sales and marketing of certain filter products, drug coated balloon catheters, and peripheral arterial disease detection products. In July 2017, a separate civil investigative demand was served by the Department of Justice seeking documents and information relating to an investigation into possible violations of the False Claims Act in connection with the sales and marketing of FloChec^® and QuantaFlo^TM devices. The Company is cooperating with these requests. Since it is not feasible to predict the outcome of these matters, the Company cannot give any assurances that the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.

Accruals for Bard-related product liability, legal defense costs and other legal matters amounted to approximately $1.8 billion at March 31, 2018. Such amounts include provisional estimates which have been recorded with respect to the acquired liabilities. These amounts may be adjusted upon the availability of new or additional information regarding facts or circumstances which existed at the acquisition date. As of March 31, 2018, the Company has $165 million in Bard-related qualified settlement funds (“QSFs”), subject to certain settlement conditions, for certain product liability matters. Payments to QSFs are recorded as a component of Restricted cash.

The Company's expected recoveries related to Bard-related product liability matters were approximately $303 million at March 31, 2018. A substantial amount of these expected recoveries at March 31, 2018 relate to the Company’s agreements with Medtronic related to certain Women’s Health Product Claims. The terms of the Company’s agreements with Medtronic are substantially consistent with the assumptions underlying, and the manner in which, the Company has recorded expected recoveries related to the indemnification obligation. The expected recoveries at March 31, 2018 related to the indemnification obligation are not in dispute with respect to claims that Medtronic settles pursuant to the agreements. As described above, the agreements do not resolve the dispute between the Company and Medtronic with respect to Women’s Health Product Claims that do not settle, if any, and the Company also may, in its sole discretion, transfer responsibility for settlement of additional Women’s Health Product Claims to Medtronic on similar terms.

Note 6 – Segment Data

Beginning in the second quarter of fiscal year 2018, the Company's organizational structure was based upon three principal business segments: BD Medical (“Medical”), BD Life Sciences (“Life Sciences”) and BD Interventional ("Interventional"). As

The Company's segments are strategic businesses that are managed separately because each one develops, manufactures and markets distinct products and services. Segment disclosures are on a performance basis consistent with internal management reporting. The Company evaluates performance of its business segments and allocates resources to them primarily based upon operating income, which represents revenues reduced by product costs and operating expenses. Beginning with its first quarter fiscal year 2018, the Company changed its management reporting approach so that certain general and administrative costs, which were previously allocated to the segments, are now excluded from the segments' operating expenses. The Medical and Life Sciences segments' operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 included allocated general corporate costs of $40 million and $29 million, respectively. The Medical and Life Sciences segments' operating income for the six months ended March 31, 2017 included allocated general corporate costs of $80 million and $54 million, respectively. No such allocations were made in the three and six months ended March 31, 2018.

Note 7 – Benefit Plans

Net pension cost included the following components for the three and six months ended March 31:

The amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in prior periods.

Note 8 – Acquisition

On December 29, 2017, the Company completed its acquisition of Bard, to create a medical technology company which is uniquely positioned to improve both the treatment of disease for patients and the process of care for health care providers.  Under the terms of the transaction, Bard common shareholders received approximately $222.93 in cash and 0.5077 shares of BD stock per Bard share. The Company financed the cash portion of total consideration transferred with available cash, which included net proceeds raised in the third quarter of fiscal year 2017 through registered public offerings of equity securities and debt transactions of approximately $4.8 billion and $9.6 billion, respectively. The operating activities of Bard from the acquisition date through December 31, 2017 were not material to the Company’s consolidated results of operations. As such, Bard's operating results were included in the Company’s consolidated results of operations beginning on January 1, 2018.

The acquisition-date fair value of consideration transferred consisted of the components below. The fair value of the shares and equity awards issued as consideration was recognized as a $6.5 billion increase to Capital in excess of par value and a $2.1 billion decrease to Common stock in treasury.

The preliminary allocations of the purchase price below provide a reasonable basis for estimating the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. These provisional estimates will be adjusted upon the availability of further information regarding events or circumstances which existed at the acquisition date and such adjustments may be significant. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed in this acquisition, as recorded in the Company's consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2018, were largely allocated to the Company's new Interventional segment.

The developed technology assets acquired represented Bard’s developed technologies in the fields of vascular, urology, oncology, and surgical specialties. The technologies’ fair values were determined based on the present value of projected cash flows utilizing an income approach with a risk-adjusted discount rate of 8%. The technologies will be amortized over an estimated weighted-average amortization period of 15 years, which is the weighted average period over which the technologies are expected to generate substantial cash flows.

The customer relationships assets acquired represented Bard’s contractual relationships with its customers. The fair value of these customer relationships was determined based on the present value of projected cash flows utilizing an income approach with a risk-adjusted discount rate of 8%. The estimated weighted-average amortization period of the customer relationships was determined to be 13 years and this period corresponds with the weighted average of lives determined for the product technology which underlies the customer contracts.

Goodwill typically results through expected synergies from combining operations of the acquiree and the acquirer, as well as from intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition. The goodwill recognized as a result of this acquisition includes, among other things, the value of combining the Company's leadership in medication management and infection prevention with an expanded offering of solutions across the care continuum. Additionally, Bard's strong product portfolio and innovation pipeline are expected to increase the Company's opportunities in fast-growing clinical areas. Revenue synergies are also expected to result from enhanced growth opportunities for the combined company in non-U.S. markets. No portion of goodwill from this acquisition was deductible for tax purposes.

Accruals for Bard-related product liability and other legal matters represented approximately $1.6 billion of the liabilities assumed. Cash and equivalents include a restricted cash balance acquired which largely represents funds that are restricted for

The net assets acquired included approximately $220 million of transition tax payable based on the Company’s best estimate of its transition tax liability under new U.S. tax legislation which is further discussed in Note 14.

Transaction costs incurred during the three and six months ended March 31, 2018 were approximately $7 million and $51 million. These transaction costs were recorded as Acquisitions and other restructurings and consisted of legal, advisory and other costs. See Note 9 for discussion regarding restructuring costs incurred relative to the Bard acquisition in the six months ended March 31, 2018.

As noted above, Bard's operating activities from the acquisition date through December 31, 2017 were not material and the Company included Bard in its consolidated results of operations beginning on January 1, 2018. Revenues and Net Income (Loss) for the three and six months ended March 31, 2018 included revenues and loss attributable to Bard of $1 billion and $202 million, respectively. The following table provides the pro forma results for the three and six months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 as if Bard had been acquired as of October 1, 2016.

The pro forma results above include the impact of the following adjustments, as necessary: additional amortization and depreciation expense relating to assets acquired; interest and other financing costs relating to the acquisition transaction; and the elimination of one-time or nonrecurring items. The one-time or nonrecurring items eliminated for the three and six months ended March 31, 2018 were primarily comprised of a fair value step-up adjustment of $422 million recorded relative to Bard's inventory on the acquisition date, the transaction costs discussed above, as well as Bard-related restructuring costs disclosed in Note 9. In addition, amounts previously reported by Bard as revenues related to a royalty income stream have been reclassified to Other income (expense), net to reflect the Company's current and future reporting classification.

Note 9 – Business Restructuring Charges

In connection with the Company's acquisition of Bard, the 2015 acquisition of CareFusion and other portfolio rationalization initiatives, the Company incurred restructuring costs during the six months ended March 31, 2018, which were recorded as Acquisitions and other restructurings. Restructuring liability activity for the six months ended March 31, 2018 was as follows:

Note 10 – Intangible Assets

Additional disclosures regarding the increases to the developed technology assets and customer relationships as a result of the Bard acquisition are provided in Note 8. Intangible amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was $370 million and $131 million, respectively. Intangible amortization expense for the six months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was $505 million and $268 million, respectively.